hers newsletter

Get involved: Sign up today and interact with other Muscle & Fitness Hers readers!

» Free Membership
» Message Boards
» Newsletters
» Special Offers

SIGN UP TODAY!
Enter Your Email Address

| Print Page | Email to Friend

METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BODYFAT


Checking your bodyfat is getting to be an exact science. Here are the pros and cons of some of the most popular methods of measurement












Technique: Dual Energy X-Ray Analysis
Precision:+/-<1%
Cost:$60-$100 per test
Time:~5 min.
Sources of Error: Most precise
Advantages: Fast; most accurate; clothing okay
Disadvantages: Not portable; apparatus is expensive; rare (only at hospitals, univeristies)

Technique:Underwater weighing
Precision:+/-1%
Cost:$25-$50 per test; ~$10,000 apparatus
Time:1 hour plus (may include enema for best results)
Sources of Error: Bone density (underestimates % of fat in African-Americans); high muscle mass (overestimates % fat in bodybuilders); gases in lung and gut; equation used (age-, race-, gender-, and activity-specific)
Advantages: Relatively accurate; very consistent (great for changes in % bodyfat); former gold standard; BIA and skinfold equations are based on this.
Disadvantages:Uncomfortable; wet; bulky apparatus; skimpy outfit required; time-consuming; expensive; hard to find (for example, colleges); bone density assumption causes error.

Technique: Bod Pod
Precision: +/-1%
Cost: $30-$65 per test; ~$30,000 apparatus
Time: 5-8 min.
Sources of Error: Same as underwater weighing; temperature; hydration
Advantages: Relatively accurate; very consistent (great for measuring changes in % bodyfat); comfortable; very fast; easy to use; usable by frail, elderly
Disadvantages: Bulky (but portable); skimpy outfit required; expensive; may be hard to find; bone denisty assumption causes error

Technique:Skinfold (Fatfold) Caliper
Precision: +/-3.5% to 4%
Cost:$15-$400 one-time purchase; $0-$35 per test
Time: 10-15 min. (includes repeats and calculations)
Sources of Error: Measuring technique; fat compressibility; age; equation used (age-, race-, gender-, and activity-specific)
Advantages:Cheap; convenient; fast; portable; useful for detecting changes in % bodyfat
Disadvantages: Requires precise and consistent technique; not accurate for very thin or very fat people; only measures fat under the skin; some caliper brands are unreliable; not an accurate estimate of actual % bodyfat; based on underwater weighing (same flaws)

Technique: Circumference Measures
Precision: +/-3.7% to 5%
Cost: free
Time: ~5 min.
Sources of Error: High error due to holding breath, tape measure placement, etc.
Advantages: Fast; free with tape measure
Disadvantages: Not very accurate

1  |  2    

| Print Page | Email to Friend



» 7 Fat-Fighting Supplements
» Olympics Special
» Building Showstopping Abs

Most Popular Articles

What is your favorite way to exercise? Join this Topic.

Share your best dinner ideas. Join this Topic.

Can a high-fat diet prevent weight-loss? Join this Topic.

Learn the facts behind fat-burners and your health. Join this Topic.